(Picture from The Promised Planet)
(Picture from The Promised Planet)
The guy in the above picture pisses
people off. Of course, he's supposed to. He is the villain of the 1960s
TV show, Lost in Space. When the show first started, he was a "classic"
bad guy -- completely dark and evil, with no redeeming qualities. The actor
portraying him, Jonathan Harris, was dissatisfied with this version of
the character, because he feared that such a character was doomed to death
within the first few episodes of the show. And so he set about changing
Dr. Smith into a comic villain -- a tragic, bumbling, cowardly, lazy character
with just enough good in him so that the producers of the show would not
be justified in bumping him off. The resulting character was one of the
most intriguing and unusual villains in the history of modern American
entertainment.
But there is something about Zachary
Smith that rubs people the wrong way even more than your typical TV show
bad guy does. What is it about this character that people find so irritating?
After all, he's not all bad. He is lazy, cowardly, dishonest and nefarious,
but he also shows a good deal of compassion at times. Perhaps it is because
he is somewhere between good and bad that he makes the average TV viewer
so uncomfortable.
There are a couple of reasons for
this phenomenon. First, it seems that it is human nature to dislike ambiguity.
People like to be able to classify things into distinct categories -- good
vs. bad, right vs. wrong, black vs. white. This very aspect of human nature
has led to countless problems throughout history. Because of this mentality,
people want their bad guys to be bad and their good guys to be good, not
to be left with the uneasy feeling of not knowing whether to like or dislike
a given character. After all, if the bad guy is anything less than pure
evil, how can we be justified in hating him? One of the most common tactics
in wartime propaganda is to dehumanize the enemy. It makes it easier to
kill them.
Perhaps even more telling are the
results of a poll recently conducted on The
Promised Planet. The poll asked visitors to think about their own character
traits and decide which Lost In Space character they most resemble. Of
the 82 people who responded, 20.7% said that they were most similar to
Dr. Smith, making him the 2nd most common choice after Will Robinson. Does
this mean that Dr. Smith makes people uncomfortable because he hits a little
too close to home?
You might not like the idea that most
people are more like Dr. Smith than they are like the saintly Robinsons.
After all, Dr. Smith represents a collection of qualities that are most
frowned upon by the traditional standards of our culture. But studies done
by psychologists on the true face of American morality have revealed some
frightening results. Apparently, the average American bases his/her moral
standard on what he/she thinks he/she can get away with, both in the eyes
of the law and in the eyes of our society and culture. (Psychologists call
this the "conventional morality" stage in ethical development (Weiten,
1995; Kohlberg, 1969).) You might be shaking your head in outrage at this
statement, but before you dismiss the idea, try the simple experiment that
my introductory psychology professor likes to demonstrate to his classes.
Take a large group of people and ask them what they would do if all legal
and social inhibitions were removed. About 90% of my classmates responded
(anonymously) that they would commit some sort of crime. While most of
them only wanted to commit such relatively "innocuous" crimes as bank robbery,
a large number reported that they would like to commit rape or murder.
My American history professor performed
a similar experiment, which revealed similarly frightening results. All
but two students out of the class of approximately twenty said that, if
a grocery store clerk were to accidentally give them too much change, they
would take it and not give back the extra. The same number said that they
would not report it if they moved into a new apartment and found that the
cable was still connected and it was not supposed to be, etc. Their excuse?
"It wasn't my mistake!"
And yet, although most of us admit
to frequent dishonesty, and the desire to commit various crimes, we also
demand extremely high ethical standards from our cultural and political
role models. The same people who admitted that they would happily carry
out a bank robbery, provided they wouldn't get caught, were outraged and
infuriated by President Clinton's philandering. We would all rather root
for the Robinsons, who are so perfect that even their mistakes are all
due to well-meaning misguidedness, than Dr. Smith, who is so uncomfortably
close to the average American's lopsided ethical standard.
First published 12/15/00.
Visitors since 12/15/00:
FastCounter by bCentral
